The problem with "same terms as Perl" licensing
Shlomi Fish brought up an angle to the problem with slapping a boilerplate "same terms as Perl itself" at the bottom of your modules when you distribute them: Which version of Perl do you mean?
For me, I've used that line out of laziness, because I didn't care to think too much about specifics of the details. Now I'll be going back and specifying in my modules.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: The problem with "same terms as Perl" licensing.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://perlbuzz.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/388
2 Comments
Leave a comment
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
Note that, contrary to Shlomi's article, (most of) Perl 5 is GPL version 1 licensed, not version 2. This in and of itself may be enough to prompt some to be more specific.
But I'd rather see a campaign to get modules to state some license (and a bug-reporting mechanism, to boot); far too many do not.