February 2009 Archives

Perl 6 stretches its wings, makes a milestone release

| No Comments

Rakudo Perl, the implementation of Perl 6 on the Parrot virtual machine, has made a milestone release.

For years now, Rakudo has been tucked into the Parrot project, but no longer. Rakudo is now its own project, with its own source repository and its own release schedule, following the Parrot release schedule closely.

This 14th development release of Rakudo is codenamed Vienna, after Vienna.pm, the Perl Mongers group that has been sponsoring Jonathan Worthington's development work since April 2008. Future releases will be named after other Perl-related cities.

This is a fantastic time to take a look at Rakudo and see what's happening. We're reaching the top of the hill, and I couldn't be more excited.

Perlbuzz news roundup for 2009-02-25

| 4 Comments

As promised, I'm going to start posting the quickie news tweets that I post to the Perlbuzz twitter feed here in the main Perlbuzz blog. These are links I found interesting and newsworthy, but didn't have any commentary or other story to go with them.

Here are the last twenty.

Mac OS X Security Update 2009-001 might break your Perl

| 1 Comment

I got errors on my Mac today complaining about IO.pm. I had just installed Parrot on the way to building up a Rakudo to work on, so I figured something in the still-not-ironed-out Parrot install had caused the problem. It looked like this:

% perl -MIO
IO object version 1.22 does not match bootstrap parameter 1.23
at /System/Library/Perl/5.8.8/....

I just figured I'd reinstall the module.I tried to update IO.pm, but the CPAN shell uses IO, and so barfed. Had to install it manually by downloading a tarball (gasp!) and doing it manually. And then everything was fine.

And then my old colleague Ed Silva IMs me asking if I knew anything about it. I had to confess I was surprised to see he had the same problem.

And now Miyagawa, bless his heart, lays it all out for you in this blog post about the Mac OS X security update. Ooopsie!

Thanks to Miyagawa for explaining the problem.

Should Perl 6 use the CPAN?

| 28 Comments

I just gave my keynote at Frozen Perl, and one of the big points I made was that we don't know what Perl 6 is going to look like. It's totally a green field. There's no toolchain, no LWP, no DBI, etc.

My big question: Should Perl 6 use the CPAN?

Does an 11 year-old distribution system make sense in 2009? In 1998, when we didn't have everything living in a cloud, and hosting websites took a lot of money, and if you wanted massive bandwidth, you were at a big company or a university. In 2009, those are no longer true.

Of course, I'm not suggesting that we don't distributing thousands of excellently awesome modules to the world. If we didn't, we wouldn't be Perl. But does it need to be through a centralized distribution channel like PAUSE + CPAN?

I don't have an answer.

Discuss.

« January 2009 | Main Index | Archives | March 2009 »